I can't be 100% sure but I think this will all wash down to the fact that
stations are no longer licensed and the control operator is fully responsible.
And I do believe that is the case. RHR has lawyers on retainer and I'm sure
this has been legally looked at. I can get the ruling they go by.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
To: 'Louis Parascondola' <gudguyham@aol.com>; topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 02:58 AM
Subject: RE: Topband: strange propagation
<div id="AOLMsgPart_2_976c86f7-c684-4874-ae95-34e58b192d67">
<style scoped="">#AOLMsgPart_2_976c86f7-c684-4874-ae95-34e58b192d67 td{color:
black;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
.aolReplacedBody p.aolmail_MsoNormal,.aolReplacedBody
li.aolmail_MsoNormal,.aolReplacedBody div.aolmail_MsoNormal {margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif";} .aolReplacedBody a:link,.aolReplacedBody
span.aolmail_MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;} .aolReplacedBody a:visited,.aolReplacedBody
span.aolmail_MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;} .aolReplacedBody
p.aolmail_MsoAcetate,.aolReplacedBody li.aolmail_MsoAcetate,.aolReplacedBody
div.aolmail_MsoAcetate {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text
Char"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} .aolReplacedBody
span.aolmail_BalloonTextChar {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} .aolReplacedBody span.aolmail_EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;} .aolReplacedBody .aolmail_MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";} @page
WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
.aolReplacedBody div.aolmail_WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} </style><div
lang="EN-US" class="aolReplacedBody"><div class="aolmail_WordSection1"><p
class="aolmail_MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Correct, but if he
doesn’t, its actually the primary responsibility of the control
operator/station owner to shut down the station to prevent further illegal
transmissions.</span></p><p class="aolmail_MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></p><p
class="aolmail_MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Ed N1UR</span></p><p
class="aolmail_MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></p><p
class="aolmail_MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Louis Parascondola
[<a href="mailto:gudguyham@aol.com?">mailto:gudguyham@aol.com</a>]
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, January 15, 2016 1:53 AM
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:sawyered@earthlink.net">sawyered@earthlink.net</a>;
<a href="mailto:topband@contesting.com">topband@contesting.com</a>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Topband: strange propagation</span></p><p
class="aolmail_MsoNormal"> </p><p class="aolmail_MsoNormal">It is the same
thing as if he was here physically, he must use his call with a / w2 or
whatever.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sawyer <<a
href="mailto:sawyered@earthlink.net">sawyered@earthlink.net</a>>
To: topband <<a href="mailto:topband@contesting.com">topband@contesting.com</a>>
Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
In the case discussed of a station remoting in and not properly identifying
(ie an Italian station remoting a USA station but continuing to use the
Italian callsign), it seems to me that the FCC would consider the station
owner the control operator and therefore responsible for the proper IDing of
transmissions made from their station.
I would think a few fines issued by the FCC to the remote station holder,
would shut these games down in a hurry. I wonder if the RHR station owners
that are being leased out by individuals realize their liability in these
circumstances. I think some people will be shocked with a certified letter
at some point and the game will quickly change.
Ed N1UR
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - <a target="_blank"
href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a></p></div></div>
</div>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|