| To: | 160 <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: inv. L |
| From: | Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:16:45 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I was considering adding a second vertical element to my 160 inverted L. This one would be roughly a quarter wave tall for use on 80. I tried modelling in Eznec, but wasn't comfortable with the results. I may have screwed it up. Has anyone tried it for real? Is it a big compromise on either band? Would a switch at the feedpoint have any benefit? My inverted L has about 50 radials. 73 Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: BOG - Selecting the Optimum Length, Lloyd - N9LB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: BOG - Selecting the Optimum Length, Mark K3MSB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: BOG - Selecting the Optimum Length, Lloyd - N9LB |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: inv. L, Clive GM3POI |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |