Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: New user, some advice needed.

To: Patrick Armstrong <ft920ir@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: New user, some advice needed.
From: Petronel YO8SEP <yo8sep@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:30:36 +0200
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
What do you mean by linear loading?
How long are your radials?

73, Petronel YO8SEP

On 21 Dec 2016 22:43, "Patrick Armstrong" <ft920ir@gmail.com> wrote:

>    I have noticed several times that people talk about being able to put
> up a full .250 wavelength vertical and I have wondered why almost never do
> they think about making it .270 wavelength instead of .250 wavelength. The
> little extra length gives a feed point impedance of 52 ohms with some
> inductive reactance which can be canceled with a series capactor. This
> gives a more efficient feed than a .250 wavelength and using an inductor to
> get a match. I designed my 75/80m vertical this way and with 65 radials (
> odd number 'cause that's all the wire I had) it has allowed me to work 280
> entities with100 watts, all SSB. (Blasphemy I know, I have an ear
> condition which made 13 wpm almost impossible for me).
>
>    I also use this antenna on 160m by using linear loading and an inductor
> for matching. Linear loading seems to be overlooked in a lot of discussions
> of antennas on this list and I wonder why. Am I missing a downside to these
> matching systems? If so I would like to hear about it.
>
>      Pat Armstrong  KF5YZ  Heart of Texas
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:00 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
> wrote:
>
>> https://www.dxengineering.com/search/product-line/dx-enginee
>> ring-160-meter-thunderbolt-vertical-antennas?autoview=SKU&
>> keyword=160%20vertical&sortby=BestKeywordMatch&sortorder=Ascending
>>
>>
>> On 12/20/2016 10:24 AM, Petronel Postolache wrote:
>>
>>> I can't find the Vertical from DX Engineering. If you can send me a link
>>> it will be great.
>>> One solution might be top hat vertical, similar with
>>> http://dl2kq.de/ant/3-1.htm . Not sure how much power is lost in the
>>> matching unit L1, C1.
>>>
>>> I would love a Waller Flag too. Imposible to buy one from here (too
>>> expensive) but I might wanna try build one. Preamp will be the biggest
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Petronel
>>> YO8SEP / YP8W
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:30 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com
>>> <mailto:w0mu@w0mu.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Check out DX Engineering.  They sell a vertical that uses 3 top
>>>     hat wires.  Sloping back down is ok.  For 80/160 you need to stop
>>>     the 80m energy with a coil/trap My 80 uses a very fast taper and
>>>     the top is only 3/8 inch or less so It cannot support a coil or t
>>>     wires.  I probably should have planned that out better.  I was
>>>     also going to try to phase two 80 elements over time but that will
>>>     not happen any time soon.
>>>
>>>     With all the metal in the yard the AY loop may not work very
>>>     well.  Waller Flag on the roof maybe.  I would love one.
>>>
>>>     W0MU
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 12/19/2016 12:24 PM, Petronel Postolache wrote:
>>>
>>>>     I can try to put a 21-22m (68-70 foot) telescopic aluminium pole,
>>>>     made from pipes 2" to 1" diameter.
>>>>     It will be a bit too long for 1/4 on 80m. I can put a T top hat
>>>>     or run an InvL, but probably need to slope it from 70 foot to
>>>>     about 40 foot. What will be better ? and will I be able to
>>>>     match/use the antenna on 80m also ?
>>>>
>>>>     About K9AY, I understood that the loop is influenced by close
>>>>     metal objects, and the property is full of wire fences, vineyard
>>>>     rows and other "metal" structures. That's why i was thinking
>>>>     about using some flag/loop at 10 feet or more above ground.
>>>>
>>>>     73, Petronel
>>>>     YO8SEP
>>>>
>>>>     160 and 80 will be difficult. Can you get another vertical up
>>>>     about 60 feet? You can top load that with a trap for 80 and have
>>>>     "t" wires at the top that also act as guy wires. You can also
>>>>     bottom load for 160 and maybe that will be good enough for you.
>>>>     Radials whatever you can do will help.An Inverted L with about
>>>>     50ft of vertical will work ok....If you can keep the horizontal
>>>>     end up in the air around the same height or more. It doesn't
>>>>     sound like you have any tall trees to work with.For receiving I
>>>>     have been very impressed with a K9AP loop. 25 ft up and about 15
>>>>     feet out at the corners. It does not take up much space and you
>>>>     can reverse the direction easily with a relay. A flag or pennant
>>>>     will work too. You can never have enough rcv or xmit antenna! HI!
>>>>     Welcome to the club!
>>>>
>>>>     W0MU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>>
>
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>