Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data)

To: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data)
From: Bruce <w8hw@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:03:35 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
You maybe confusing "Radiation Resistance" with "Feed point Resistance". It often will lower "Feed point Resistance", but raise "radiation Resistance". 73 Bruce

On 1/22/2019 9:45 AM, Peter Bertini wrote:
I would think adding radials would lower the Radiation resistance.  Also,
the SWR curve should narrow as ground losses are reduced;  since the effect
of ground loss resistance swamping the results lessens.

At some point I suggest, as others, that you get on for the contest and see
what you can do.  If you can run a bit of power, it will help.  Receiving
is indeed the tough nut to crack on 160 Meters.

Elevated radials may be worth a shot. I think Mike uses two with good
results. I went to a K2AV FCP and it works good enough for my needs. Even
with a K9AY loop system receiving is still my weak point.

Get on for the contests and have some fun.

Pete
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>