Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

To: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?
From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:24:06 -0400
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Peter, Not all countries allow FT-8 ops on 1840.  JA's work split on
11908.  Last night attempts to work a VU2 he was only able to legally TX
around 1816 with my FT-8 being on 1844.  The agreement came way before FT-8
or other digital modes.  They also don't take in consideration for some
DX-peditions where split operating is required.

Herb, KV4FZ

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:49 PM Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I recall hearing FT8 activity on 1830 kHz last evening ... isn't a bit low
> in the band for digital modes?  I hope FT-8 activity doesn't squeeze all of
> the CW activity down into the DX portion before the dust settles.
>
> Pete k1zjh
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>