| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160m activity and propagation |
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:21:04 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I suspect that you are exactly right, Jim. :-) On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, 12:51 PM Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote: > > I suspect much of the difference may be RX noise levels at both ends of > the path. The number of RX noise sources has mushroomed over the past > decade, with SMPS, variable speed motor controllers, solar systems, and > the bean counters at power utilities that down-prioritize the > maintenance of their distribution lines. > > 73, Jim K9YC > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160m activity and propagation, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Bev flex high noise troubleshooting, WW3S |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m activity and propagation, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m activity and propagation, VE6WZ Steve |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |