| To: | topband@contesting.com, terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Inverted V verses inverted L |
| From: | terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:57:00 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I have an inverted L. Unfortunately it is noisey but I do the best I can. I've been contemplating putting up and inverted V on 160 meter too in hopes it could give me more 'local' coverage and a quieter background noise. One of many projects I'd like to get done as usual. I've also considered a second inverted L with elevated radials to see if that might work better. Terry KI7M _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L, daraymond |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Inverted V verses inverted L, Jim Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L, Peter Krulewitch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted V verses inverted L, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |