Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

To: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year
From: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:00:53 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
you guys complain a lot.  :)

Get on the air and work them.  If you can't hear them either accept it or
do something about it.

Sitting on your but won't make it better.   Ask yourself, what can I do
about it?


   - How old are your feedlines?  Are 100% sure they are as good as the day
   you installed them?
   - Noise -- did you know that 80% of the low band noise is in your own
   house - fix it as it isn't going to fix itself and don't be so sure to
   blame someone or something else until you confirm it.  Quit guessing.
   - Not sure what to do, ask for help.  There is lots of great knowledge
   here.
   - Give up and take up stamp collecting or collect candles.  The good
   thing with candles is that if you don't like them, you can always burn
   them.  They are also the perfect gift.


Mike va3mw


On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:52 PM uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net> wrote:

> Hi Lee
>
> My English is very weak.
> I can't argue with you ..
>
> 1- I agree that there are very good RX antennas.
> But I repeat - there are no super RX antennas.
>
> 2 - if there is a lot of industrial interference near your QTH, a good
> RX antenna will not help.
>
> 3- Very weeks conditions - a good RX antenna similarly won't help ..
>
> Try listening to Europe tomorrow at 13.00 - 15.00 UTC time.
> I am sure there will be no result.
>
> 73
>
> ---
> Nick, UY0ZG
> http://www.topband.in.ua
>
> Lee STRAHAN писал 2020-12-01 19:40:
> > Hmmm, Nick,
> >   I beg to differ with you. I don’t care about scores or countries,
> > zones  worked but I do care about 160 meter receiving antennas.
> > In my opinion your statement is dead wrong.
> > Not looking for a war of words or any more discussion. I will not
> > respond again about this.
> >
> > Lee   K7TJR
> > Hi-Z Antennas
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Topband <topband-bounces+k7tjr=msn.com@contesting.com> On Behalf
> > Of uy0zg
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 7:10 AM
> > To: peter.voelpel@t-online.de
> > Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband
> > <topband-bounces+uy0zg=mksat.net@contesting.com>
> > Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
> >
> > Dr Peter
> >
> > Super RX antennas for 160 m do not exist!
> >
> > Exist  :
> > - good conditions
> > - Quiet countryside
> > -  Geography
> >
> > Does not exist :
> >
> > - Miracles
> >
> > ____________________________
> >
> > I never envy. They envy me!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In CQ WW I only heard three from the USA - K7GM, W1KM, W3UA.
> >
> > These are honest QSOs.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Nick, UY0ZG
> > http://www.topband.in.ua
> >
> > dj7ww@t-online.de писал 2020-12-01 16:38:
> >> It´s amazing, the probably envious stations always suspect others with
> >> their better antennas and perhaps better operation to use web sdr.
> >>
> >> 73
> >> Peter
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Topband
> >> [mailto:topband-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com]
> >> On
> >> Behalf Of uy0zg
> >> Sent: Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2020 14:19
> >> To: Tom | SP5XO
> >> Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband
> >> Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>   Weeks conditions ?
> >>
> >> For the best of the ex USSR countries, this is not a problem!
> >>
> >>
> >> Very good HIGH + WEB SDR+ very kind and democratic American judges  =
> >>
> >>
> >> super result is ready!
> >>
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2020-11/msg08693.html
> >>
> >>
> >> .........
> >>
> >> 73 !
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Nick, UY0ZG
> >> http://www.topband.in.ua
> >>
> >> Tom | SP5XO ????? 2020-12-01 14:21:
> >>> Compare to recent weeks conditions were marginal during CQWW. Only
> >>> two Zone
> >>> 4 stations were audible here and it took long time to work them.
> >>> Whereas a
> >>> week ago band was wide open from MI, IL to CO or even down to TX.
> >>> I worked only mults and Dx's this time. Only 13 stations from Zone 5
> >>> in my log. Except for VY2ZM all NA's were weak including KC1XX and
> >>> W3LPL!
> >>> Hopeful things improve for next weekend and will work some more in
> >>> ARRL 160.
> >>> CU
> >>> Tom
> >>> sp5xo
> >>>
> >>> Conditions certainly didn't favor 160 over the weekend CQWW contest
> >>> here in
> >>>> Florida at least.
> >>>>
> >>>> Looking back in 2019 I worked 50 countries on 160 during CQWW, this
> >>>> year it was only 17, only 3 Europeans and those were very weak. I'm
> >>>> sure the lack of expeditions due to CV-19 played a part but on whole
> >>>> I think many guys in hindsight will be glad they didn't spend the
> >>>> money to go.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe things will pick up next weekend for the ARRL 160 test though
> >>>> that tends to be largely a USA to USA test and it is hard to hear
> >>>> the DX through the local mob
> >>>>
> >>>> CU guys in the pile up
> >>>>
> >>>> Dave
> >>>> NR1DX
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _________________
> >>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> >>> Reflector
> >> _________________
> >> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> >> Reflector
> >>
> >> _________________
> >> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> >> Reflector
> > _________________
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> > _________________
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>