Hi
Seems people still have a complex with some modes
If you don´t like SSB, CW or FT8, just don´t do it and let the people do
what they want
Or just spend the money to do a DXPedition and do what you want, works 100%
CW?, great!!
I can tell that in the case of J28MD I worked them in many slots, included
80 and 160 mts CW and FT8, great operators
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
El sáb, 5 nov 2022 a las 20:26, Wes (<wes_n7ws@triconet.org>) escribió:
> I'm far from an FT8 expert* but on F/H mode the Fox does move the selected
> hound
> to his frequency. If contact is not completed on the first sequence he
> will
> move the hound to another frequency, rinse and repeat once more and you
> need to
> start over.
>
> To their credit, IMHO, P29RO is actually also working traditional RTTY. I
> now
> have them on 5 bands on RTTY.
>
> * A couple of my clubs have impromptu "competitions" on certain
> DXpeditions
> where the scoring is the number of slots (band/modes). So if you want to
> compete, you have to use FT8/FT4. I kick and scream and work them, but to
> date
> I refuse to claim DXCC credit for the Qs. This has created a personal
> dilemma,
> because my DXCC number 339 is Mt Athos on FT8. I haven't claimed it and
> probably won't unless I work #340, Glorioso, which will probably never
> happen in
> this lifetime.
>
> Wes N7WS
>
> On 11/5/2022 2:50 PM, Michael Tope wrote:
> > I am glad to hear T88WA is not at the hotel club station. The club
> station has
> > a low dipole on 160 which in the past has made a poor showing.
> >
> > I managed to get a response from P29RO on 160 meter FT8 on Friday
> morning, but
> > didn't think it was a complete QSO. I am new to "hound" mode and WSJT-X
> kept
> > changing my transmit frequency. I think I was calling at 1086 Hz, and
> when I
> > got the response from P29RO, the program moved my TX frequency to match
> the
> > P29s QRG (504 Hz) and responded there. Not sure what was going on. In
> any
> > case, I was a bit stunned to see that I showed up in the P29 log. I
> suppose
> > our exchange meets the bare minimum for a QSO - their computer decoded
> my call
> > and signal report and my computer decoded theirs. Definitely not as
> satisfying
> > as a clean CW QSO, but I am pretty certain they were too weak for that.
> Much
> > of the time I wasn't decoding them and couldn't see them on the
> waterfall
> > display.
> >
> > 73, Mike W4EF....................
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
--
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|