To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Kites? |
From: | Boye Christensen via Topband <topband@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Boye Christensen <oz7c@ddxg.dk> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Dec 2022 21:36:53 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
HiKeep in mind a 1/2 wave vertical feeding inpedance 1-3 Kohm this means high voltage ? ON4UN tried on his isolated tover for 164m 40m high to do so on 80 m, and only worked on low power ? Ended up with 4 1/4 wave slopers on the top 80m the best vertical will be a 3/8 wave concerning feeding impedance 73 Boye On 20-12-2022 21:23, Cecil acuff wrote: Keep in mind…FAA requires anything over 200’ be registered with them and have obstruction lighting. If near an airport that elevation may be much lower or even not allowed. 1/2 wave on 160m…260’+. Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPhoneOn Dec 20, 2022, at 1:39 PM, Chris Maness <christopher.maness@gmail.com> wrote: I am wondering what type of kite would produce the most consistent result for a 1/2 wave vertical. I am thinking 1/2 lamda so that I don't have to fuss with a radial field. -- Thanks, Chris Maness _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector_________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Kites?, Cecil acuff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Kites?, Joe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Kites?, Cecil acuff |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Kites?, Joe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |