[Top] [All Lists]


To: <>
Subject: Antenna
From: (n4si)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 01:13:17 +0000
> From:
To: <>
> Date:          Tue, 3 Dec 1996 12:27:11 -0500
> To:  
> Cc:  
> Subject:       Re: Antenna

> In a message dated 96-12-02 23:57:17 EST, Steve, K7LXC wrote:

>       The TH5 was designed by trial and error about 25-30 years ago.  The
> Force 12 antennas have been extensively computer modelled and optimized using
> unique design properties and tools that are currently available.  While the
> jury is still out in the longterm on-the-air results for Force 12 antennas...

I don't mean to be picky, and maybe it's because I'm a big fan of 
HyGain antennas, but, while "trial and error" is a somewhat accurate 
representation of the "cut and try" method of antenna building one 
does on a real live antenna range (which HyGain has), it implies a 
"hit or miss" approach to antenna design, which HyGain does not do.

When the TH5 (and its family members) were designed, "tools" such as 
computer modelling were not only not available, but HyGain was 
virtually the only manufacturer that did true range testing, thus 
optimizing using real world results.

You are absolutely right, the jury is still out on Force 12 and any 
of the other relative newcomers in the antenna game. HyGain antennas 
have a significant track record (I have a TH6DXX) that can be 
corroborated by interviewing owners and users, or, as they say, "ask 
the man who owns one."

According to  Dick Weber, K5IU, in a talk some years ago at W9DXCC, 
when computer modelling became widely available, the 204 (or 5, I 
can't remember) BA was run, and not only were the RF specs pretty 
close to optimal for the dimensions and materials used, but the 
physical specs for survivability were, too.

Compared to a lot of other antenna construction methods, HyGains are 
pretty rugged. That is not to say that others don't work, but sheet 
metal screws and rivets, for example, aren't the intuitive rugged 
methods I would have selected, but I'm not a structural engineer, and 
at least in the case of rivets, there is an aerodynamic case to be 

There is much to be said for "trial and error."

73, Rod N4SI
    The DXer formerly known as N9AKE

FAQ on WWW:     
Administrative requests:
Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & KM9P

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>