> They suggest that the applicant pursue less obtrusive antennas such as "flat
> panels, small dishes, and shorter monopoles without cross elements" (whatever
> that means).
It seems that the pannel is not informed on the frequencies you are
oprating on and the antenna requirements for sucessfull/efficient
operation. It would seem to me that if this was explained in terms of
being able to communicate outside a disaster area (i.e. outside the
affected area after an earthquake), and the antennas necessary for this
type of communication it might change their tune. I used to live in CA
and earthquakes are something most everyone understands.
They are telling you to use a dish and a dipole on 2M! Show them a dish
for 2M that will give you the same gain as that yagi and they'll let you
have the beam!
Al, KE1FO, ex. KE6BER mailto:email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org
Check out my web page, http://www.tiac.net/users/ke6ber for summaries
from the contest reflector and a growing list of amateur radio links.
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & N4VJ / K4AAA