Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

## [TowerTalk] guy tension

 To: [TowerTalk] guy tension k0gug@juno.com (Jerry K. Liley) Sat, 03 May 1997 10:36:27 EDT
 ```Hi Steve. I just wanted to congratulate you on a very precise explanation of the need for guy tension differences at different heights Your reasons are clearly explained and easy to understand. Not an easy project for a potentially complicated subject. I, for one, have printed it and filed it away. 73, Jerry K0GUG ******************** On Fri, 02 May 1997 20:55:13 -0500 Steve Sawyers n0yvy writes: >As you correctly noted, the tension on guy wires is to hold a tower in >place as a load - wind or otherwise is applied.I will try to explain this without going into a lot of math. >Any structure, when a load is applied, will move. There is no such this >as an immovable object. The tower support at a guy anchor has a lateral spring effect resisting any and all side loads at the guy cluster. The stiffness of the lateral spring is a function of number of guys (we are used to 3 or 4, but more >are possible) times the stretchiness of the guy material (yes steel guy wire is stretchy to an engineer) divided by the weight of the guy material. The steepness of the guy wires enter into it also.>For a given tower and guy material, the higher the tension divided by the weight, the closer to vertical the guys will hold the tower for a given load. If you just increase the weight of the guys without increasing the tension, you allow the tower to move farther down wind. This increases the bending on the tower section. Tower sections are designed to handle compressive load equally on all three or four legs. They do not do well when you add bending stress caused by a tower that has slack guys. As you increase guy tension, you do increase the load on the tower, so to much of a good thing is not always good. So there is a balancing point. Another consideration is the effect of wind on the guy wires themselves. If you get them too loose, they start a slow whip and move the tower back and forth ie. induces fatigue in the tower. If you get them really tight then they hum like a fiddle string and fatigue the guys at a high cycle rate. People smarter than me, have done a lot of "what if" analysis and determined that for all the trade offs, the guy range should be in the 8-15% of tensile strength to keep the tower straight and the guys from flapping or singing. My rule of thumb is 8% if the guy is out at 100% of tower height, 10% if at 80% of tower height (standard Rohn drawings) and up to 15% if the anchor point is at 65% of tower height. You loose a lot of wind load in this last type of installation. >If you are really interested in this get a book called 'Cable Structures" by Max Irvine. Max was (is?) a Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of South Wales in Australia. The book was originally published in 1981 by MIT Press (they have some knowledge of engineering) and was republished by Dover books in 1991. Mine is the later. ISBN is 0-486-67127-5. The price printed on mine was \$8.95 - best money I ever spent on a book.It is a bit of slow read - he starts out with the analysis of stone arches and inverts it for catenary cables. But I found it very understandable. The math is algebra, geometry and trig including hyperbolics, but not a lot of fancy calculus until you get into the analysis of the dynamic reaction of a cable structure and you need it there. I do suggest you make an equation sheet of variable definitions as you go through it with page references as I had to flip back and forth to pull some things together. Not exactly night table material but good lunch hour brain food. de n0yvy steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com ```
 Current Thread [TowerTalk] guy tension, Edward Hancock [TowerTalk] guy tension, Steve Sawyers n0yvy [TowerTalk] guy tension, Jerry K. Liley <=