Bill, I call that one HECK of a brainstorm - maybe a brain tsunami when you
consider how much trouble it would save). Besides, it's just . . . SLICK
and I sure hope others like you jump on this - I'd like to see it go all the
way to prototype and up the tower! I guess it's going to take some smart
rotator controller guys to sense the flux-compass signals and adjust the
Bill Coleman AA4LR <email@example.com> wrote:
>Here's one of those really radical ideas that strikes from time to time.
>The biggest problem with beam slippage on the mast is you simply don't
>know which way you are pointing.
>What if you had a way to determine where the beam was pointed, regardless
>of how the rotator was turned?
>a) install a flux-gate compass at the end of a beam, run the wires
>through the boom and down to the shack to an indicator.
>b) mount a tiny b&w camera on the tower looking "up" at the beam. Run the
>video to a screen in the shack. Calibrate the screen with points for N,
>E, S, W.
>Perhaps there's other methods to remotely sense the position of the beam.
>Once the beam no longer needs to be tightly coupled to the mast for
>positioning, maybe there's room for a fluid coupling between the rotating
>motor and the mast, which would take care of some of the torque problems.
>Just a brainstorm....
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com