On Thu, 10 Jul 1997 11:20:35 +0100 BST email@example.com
(Anthony R. Gold) writes:
>I believe the problem is that this list, like many other are (IMVHO)
>badly configured such that replying to the list is quite hard.
>Of the several amateur radio lists that I read, only the hamlaw
>reflector sends out its mail with a Reply-To: header addressing the
>list. Other lists just send out reflected mail with the original's
>From: author header, so readers using bog-standard email software who
>simply `reply' to an item on towertalk or any of the other lists
>hosted by contesting.com will reply just to an item's author alone.
> Tony - G3SKR / W2TG email: firstname.lastname@example.org
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
I have solved this "problem" by simply adding the DX, Contest, Towertalk
and topband reflectors to my address book with appropriate short
alias names such as "DX, Contest, Tower, 160". Then I simply delete
the senders return address and type in the short alias. No problem.
de Tom N4KG
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com