Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Relays--summary

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Relays--summary
From: RHealy@mdsroc.com (Healy, Rus)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 09:25:08 -0400
Certainly, for high-SWR situations, wider contact spacing is a good
thing. I was seeking a source of relays for switching in a 50-ohm system
(where the peak voltage never gets very high), which I didn't specify.
Apologies.

--73, Rus

>----------
>From:  Jim Reid[SMTP:jreid@aloha.net]
>Sent:  Friday, July 25, 1997 8:18 PM
>To:    Healy, Rus; towertalk@contesting.com
>Subject:       Re: [TowerTalk] Relays--summary
>
>At 10:30 AM 7/25/97 -0400, you wrote:
>>Gang,
>>
>>Thanks for the input on relays. Interestingly, I got more messages
>>asking for a summary than I did with actual input.
>>
>>The overwhelming winner was the Radio Shack 275-218 DPDT, 12-V coil
>>relay with 10-A contacts, which sells for about $6.99. 
>
>Hi again,  Rus,
>
>But what about high swr situations?  I was afraid of the close
>contact spacing in  the RS relays.  When running 1.5kW to my
>V-beams,  can get some pretty high vswr in the feed system.
>
>For example, at a 3:1 vswr in my 450 ohm feedline,  and at
>1.5kW, the peak voltage is about 2000!  And rms voltage is
>1400+.  So I decided to go with bigger relay units  with
>good contact separation.  as I had no idea when a voltage
>might stand on the line at the relay position near the peak
>values.  Maximum rf current at the same conditions is
>only 3.2 amps in the 450 ohm setup.
>
>With 50 ohm coax,  the same vswr and power result in only
>670 volts peak,  but 9.5 amps of rf current.
>
>Anyway,  that's why I chose the bigger,  and more costly
>antenna system switching relays.
>
>73,  Jim, KH7M
>
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>