Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Tower info--"Duty to inform"

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tower info--"Duty to inform"
From: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 22:58:04 -0800
And I thought IMHO and IMO were legitimate 
LEGAL disclaimers (IMHO) :) 73, Bob AA0CY

----------
From:  K7LXC@aol.com[SMTP:K7LXC@aol.com]
Sent:  Tuesday, February 03, 1998 4:51 PM
To:  w2up@itw.com
Cc:  towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:  Re: [TowerTalk] Tower info--"Duty to inform"

In a message dated 98-02-03 18:46:25 EST, w2up@itw.com writes:

> They are claiming that it is the conference organizer's 
>  responsibility to validate all material presented.
>  
>  Just think... If the conference organizer is held liable, K7LXC 
>  (and W4AN?) could be held liable for any misinformation posted on 
>  this reflector, leading to harm.
>  
      Interesting...and true I imagine. We live in a litiguous society and
although I'm not aware of any lawsuits along the lines you mentioned in our
hobby, it is certainly (gulp!) possible. Maybe I should talk to my attorney to
see what sort of a disclaimer I need. (Hey, O'Connell - are you any help
here?)

73,  Steve  K7LXC

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>