Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ?????

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ?????
From: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 14:05:13 EST
In a message dated 98-02-06 13:27:26 EST, ddjones@nas.com writes:

>  I'm surprised to see all the negative barbs thrown toward Rohn for
protecting
>   themselves in a society that circles like buzzards to sue the guy next
door.
> 
>   Good for Rohn!!
>  
Hi, Dale --

     All excellent comments with a ring of truth in them. I've said this
before - tower companies are insurance driven. That is, their insurance costs
are their biggest cost. 

     With hams typically overloading their tower systems (the number one tower
failure mode according to Rohn), I wouldn't want my products so grossly mis-
used either. 

     BTW, Rohn does have a commercial grade self-supporting tower available -
the RTP. It's available up to 190 feet. While more expensive than the
glorified TV tower BX series, it'll take a more aggressive load.

73,  Steve  K7LXC

     TOWER TECH -- professional tower supplies and services for amateurs

     Yes, I'm a Rohn installer and dealer.

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>