This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--part0_892643996_boundary
Content-ID: <0_892643996@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
--part0_892643996_boundary
Content-ID: <0_892643996@inet_out.mail.aol.com.2>
Content-type: message/rfc822
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Return-Path: <doc@roadrunner.com>
Received: from rly-zc05.mx.aol.com (rly-zc05.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.5]) by
air-zc05.mail.aol.com (v41.15) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 23:59:23
-0400
Received: from internet.roadrunner.com (internet.roadrunner.com
[198.59.109.7])
by rly-zc05.mx.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id XAA24373 for <K7LXC@aol.com>;
Tue, 14 Apr 1998 23:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: doc@roadrunner.com
Received: from doc (dialesp172.roadrunner.com [209.12.74.172])
by internet.roadrunner.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA21971
for <K7LXC@aol.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 21:57:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <35342F46.1D58A3D3@roadrunner.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 21:53:42 -0600
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
To: K7LXC@aol.com
Subject: your recommendation?
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Hi Steve--
What is your take on the following antenna situation:
I currently use a TH7DX at 50' on Rohn 25. I have in storage a Rohn
tilt-over tower (68'), an unused Force 12 EF420, and a Big Horn 4 el 15M
delta loop beam (the only one built, I believe, on an 18' boom).
Do you think it is worth the extra hassle of putting up these
monobanders on the tilt-over (when I move) or will it be just about as
good but with less potential trouble to continue using the TH7? (My
main interests are IOTA and 80M--only need 3 more all time countries and
12 zones plus about 30 countries on 10M to complete 5B DXCC and 5B WAZ.
So I mainly deal with IOTA pileups now which are usually on 20 or 15M.)
I gather that a stack of 2 TH7's would be considerably better that the
single bigger monobanders but I don't think there is room on the
tilt-over for such an arrangement. Also have considered using a Force
12 4BA above the EF420. I assume that the tower would support this
load.
What do you suggest?
thanks, Doc K7SO
--part0_892643996_boundary--
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|