Geez. . . I've been flooded with posts about the response from the
gentleman from Idaho. Steve's comments below are dead right. . . with
the Idaho approach, you'll end up with squat. They do hold the cards
folks. I'm delighted to get out of the deal for a piddly $62.
73 to all. . . Dave
> From: K7LXC@aol.com[SMTP:K7LXC@aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 1998 8:43 PM
> To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
> email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] city council horror
> In a message dated 98-06-23 20:54:20 EDT, email@example.com writes:
> > I'm afraid that if it were me , I'd have told THEM to "Take A
> Hike" !! I
> > sure as heck would'nt have paid them any money for a "permit" on
> > that I already installed years ago !! Plus was told by "city
> > that I did'nt need any permit because there was no code on the
> subject !
> > Call me a trouble maker if you like , but I'd have made THEM prove
> to me in
> > a court that I needed the permit . These people are elected are
> they not?
> > They work for us don't they . I think that they are just money
> > (who***) and go after easy targets , like hams who do not wish to
> > trouble . Next thing you know we will have to put little stickers
> on our
> > towers and register them every year !!!! Opps..... guess I
> should not
> > give THEM any ideas , THEY may be listening !!!! Just my opinion.
> Whoa, Easy, big fellah. With that attitude you'd wind up with
> LESS than
> zero. THEY hold all the cards. THEY tell you what is possible. THEY
> fines. THEY issue building permits.
> YOU got squat.
> Cheers, Steve K7LXC
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com