[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk]Rotator and Antenna Standards

To: <>
Subject: [TowerTalk]Rotator and Antenna Standards
From: (
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:36:36 EST
Greetings, TowerTalkians --

      I forwarded a couple of our on-going discussion posts to Tom Schiller,
N6BT, chief designer at Force 12. Here's his reply:

In a message dated 99-03-02 11:20:55 EST, you write:

> Appreciate the information. I was impressed that apparently nobody has 
> noticed the 70 mph mast torque spec in Force 12 specs for the last several 
> years. I spend a lot of effort to keep this number below 1000 inch pounds. 
> Kurt mentioned that the bulk of the antenna design time is on electrical and
> not mechanical. In our case, this is not so and never has been. I began the
> balanced antenna quest" back in 1978. The one I used for several years had a
> 48' boom 4el 20 with a 2el 40 on it, then a 36' boom 6el 15 above it, with a
> 36' boom 8el 10 at the top of the mast. I turned all of this with a 
> TailTwister and still have the rotator - never touched it. I wrote my own 
> software to compute the moments and fins, if necessary, which I did not use 
> on my installation.
>       In production designs, I average more than three fold the time on 
> mechanical as electrical design, which is why they take so long. There are 
> many cases where the mechanical drives the electrical.  Some of the 
> mechanical issues are more than balance, such as the 30" open area in the C-
> 31XR. That took me 6 months and was a combination of mechanical and 
> electrical solutions.
>       If you want to share some or all of this, that's all right. Besides the 
> standard 70 mph mast torque spec in the Force 12 brochure, maybe we should 
> add another at 50 mph, or some other velocity. The latest request we have is
> from Europeans who want the torque in Newtons.
>       73, Tom, N6BT
>       Force 12, Inc.

FAQ on WWW:     
Administrative requests:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>