Ken Hirschberg wrote:
> Hello, Ralph -
> Yes, the 77 material is fine, and is probably a better choice for 160 meters.
> The reference may be a typo; Amidon lists only a 1020 size in the 43
> material.(same half-inch ID, but shorter) You're just choking off potential
> "double-L" current, which hopefully would be small, so heating should not be a
> problem at legal powers.
>
> Regards, Ken K6HPX
>
> Ralph Fedor wrote:
>
> > I want to slip a stack of beads over the terminal end of my RG-213 supplying
> > my 160 antenna (1/4 wave vertical wire suspended from a catenary line with 8
> > elevated radials at 12 feet).
> >
> > ON4UN's book recommends Amidon 43-1024. I can only find 77 material in
> > Amidon's listing. Is this a typo? Will 77 material (77-1024) be OK?
> >
> > Responses to me OK.
> >
> > 73-
> > Ralph - K0IR
> >
> > --
> > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> > Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> > Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|