[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Re:

To: <>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Re:
From: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:36:37 +0008

Hi Nat,

I'm sure you'll get lots of answers to your very reasonable 
questions.  I think 30 feet of house-bracketed Rohn 25 is very 
sensible.  The Rohn Catalog gives lots of information and examples.
The reason I think so is that I've used 30 feet of house-bracketed 
Rohn P30 (lighter duty that #25) for over 30 years, in a 70mph zone. 
(Yes, I know I've been lucky!)  I had a Force-12 C3 on it from 1993 
until 1998, when I put up a C4SXL.  I have now replaced the little 
tower with a sturdy 55 foot crankup, and I'm looking forward to the 
extra height, especially for the 40 meter band.

> -- Or even more simple: is the performance of a beam at 30' worth the
> effort and $$ (compared to my dipole in a tree at a similar height)? Going
> higher than that would not endear me to my neighbors!

The performance of a beam at 30 feet will be head and shoulders above 
the performance of dipoles at the same height.  Just because 30 feet 
isn't "ideal" doesn't mean it isn't worth doing! 

My advice (worth every penny you're paying me!) is... put a C-3 at 30 
feet  (or 32 feet... remember you can gain a little altitude with the 
mast) and enjoy a new world!

By the way, I'm only a satisfied Force-12 customer, not a stockholder 
or brother-in-law, etc.

George T. Daughters, K6GT

FAQ on WWW:     
Administrative requests:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>