Well done, Kurt.
Rohn actually uses two wind load figures on their guying diagram pages. One is
"flat membered loads" (the lower of the two numbers) and the other is for
loads" (the higher of the two numbers).
Looking at it this way, there are two numbers for every antenna and two numbers
every tower. If you are using the high number for the tower, you should also
high number for the antennnas you are putting on it. If you are using the low
for the tower, you can use the low number for the antennas you are putting on
we get into trouble is when we use the high number for the tower and the low
the antennas . . .
So if you are given only ONE number for the antennas, which number is it? High
I will bet it is the LOW one since that is the number that makes the antenna
seem like a
smaller load on the tower and will, therefore, sell the most antennas. So, when
matching these antennas to a tower for checking the tower windload, you had
the low number provided by Rohn.
This is why it is so critically important to know how the antenna manufacture
determined the windload of his antennas.
I am not really aware if tower makers other than Rohn give one number or two.
I have read from Kurt, I would guess they supply only one number and that would
be the low one, or the most conservative one, which is the appropriate one to
the numbers most antenna makers provide (the low one).
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com