And the corollary: Never take your legal advice from an engineer <g>
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred Hopengarten <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: <GIG38@aol.com>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 1999 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Guy alignment - friendly wager
> Fred Hopengarten K1VR 781/259-0088
> Six Willarch Road
> Lincoln, MA 01773-5105
> permanent e-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org
> if sending attachments: email@example.com
> On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:25:00 EDT GIG38@aol.com writes:
> >Anyone care to help settle a friendly argumentative discussion and
> >wager on aligning guy points?
> K1VR: Trick question. Both methods result in the same degree of
> accuracy. One method relies on making the tower legs match the three 120
> degree lines, and the other method relies on one string lining up with a
> tower leg. As the human eye can only see one sight line at a time, you
> are really talking about apples and apples. One line v. one line. Each
> method is equally accurate or inaccurate, the 120 degree lines will be
> fine -- in each method, the challenge is aligning a leg and line.
> P.S. Never take your engineering advice from a lawyer...
> Get the Internet just the way you want it.
> Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
> Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: email@example.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com