Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Wire size

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Wire size
From: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:26:52 -0500
This subject is treated very thoroughly in ON4UN's new ARRL
book, "Low Band DXing". I will send you a summary if you do not
have access to a copy.

(((73)))
Phil, K5PC
"The Dark Ages were caused by a Y1K problem"

----- Original Message -----
From: N. S. FIRESTONE <w3svj@juno.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 1999 6:17 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Wire size


>
> Is there any theoretical or, more importantly, practical difference in
> the performance of a vertical antenna using "skinny" buried radials.
> If I planned to use ten radials of #16 bare copper and then decided to go
> with 4/0 bare copper instead of the #16, was the money difference well
> spent?
> Ignoring the chemical/mechanical survivability of the heavier wire would
> the RF care?
>
> 73 de Nate, W3SVJ, in Pittsburgh where it's not so smokey anymore.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Get the Internet just the way you want it.
> Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
> Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>