Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Re: The Ultimate One Tower System

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: The Ultimate One Tower System
From: wx0b@arraysolutions.com (Jay Terleski)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 09:03:21 -0800
The offsets can be compensated for easily with a little longer coaxial
calbe that acts as a delay line to electrically aliegn the driven
elements, when pointed in the same direction.

Its already been done.

Jay

Pete Smith wrote:
> 
> Would take a heckuva tower -- I'm not sure even Rohn 45 would be heavy
> enough, but otherwise I agree.
> 
> The only issue I can see is that running the C51s and C31s together for a
> 4-high stack could be problematical because of the horizontal offset of the
> C31 part of the C51 array -- might somewhat degrade the pattern on 20-10.
> It'd be interesting to model, though.
> 
> Doesn't VE1JF have something similar?  Jim, you out there?
> 
> 73,  Pete N4ZR
> 
> Don't forget to update your entry in the contest station database
> http://206.102.70.3/search.htm
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

-- 
Jay Terleski
WX0B - Array Solutions
www.arraysolutions.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>