[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] re: The Ultimate (Perfect) Ground?

To: <>
Subject: [TowerTalk] re: The Ultimate (Perfect) Ground?
From: (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 12:33:07 -0500
At 09:16 AM 12/23/1999 -0800, Al Williams wrote:
>If all of the radiated energy directed towards ground is reflected
>upwards by a "perfect salt water ground", then the skyward
>power can only be doubled--3db.  Why then is a salt water
>location so coveted?

Model a vertical with EZNEC over good-quality real ground -- maximum signal
is -0.03 dBi at a 26 degree takeoff.  Over very good ground, the gain is
1.26 dBi @ 21 degrees.  Model the same antenna over hypothetical perfect
ground, and the gain is 5.15 dBi at the horizon.  Salt water is somewhere
in between, of course, but signals at lower take-off angles would receive a
very useful boost.

Maybe you were thinking of horizontal antennas, where the benefit is much
less pronounced.  For example, a dipole at 1 wavelength over perfect ground
has a maximum gain of 8.24 dBi, while the same dipole over real ground,
ranging from medium to very good, only drops back to 7.65-7.77 dBi.

73,  Pete N4ZR

Don't forget to update your entry in the contest station database

FAQ on WWW:     
Administrative requests:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>