Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array ..

 To: [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .. W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch) Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:21:56 -0400
 ```I'm not trying to re-invent the wheel here, but to make a point we should always keep in mind when dealing with coaxial lines. > If I recall correctly, the feedlines must be open-circuit (OC) > because ~3/8 wavelength OC adds inductance to make the undriven > elements look like parasitic reflectors in the system. I guess they I think what we often miss is the inside of the shield and outside are always two different conductors when the shield is several skin depths thick, which would cover any shield on any cable we have at HF. The can be no current inside the shield unless we allow a differential current to be applied to the center conductor and shield. To do anything with that current, the system has to do something BETWEEN the shield and the center....not between the shield and the outside world. All of our systems (hopefully) operate that way. We strive to make them that way, since that is only real advantage to using coaxial lines! That is the single effect that allows us to bury the cable, put the cable in with a group of cables, and do what we like with the cable shield grounding without affecting our antennas. If we open the center conductor, the impedance across the feedpoint of the dipole is the same no matter what we do with the shield as a single terminal....as long as the feedline has no common-mode current. That is the job of a balun, and feedline routing/grounding/length. A properly located balun can do that job more effectively than simply opening the shield at the tower. If we dress the feedline so it picks up minimal radiation, and if we used a good choke balun (and correct length of the cable from the antenna to the point where it is grounded), there is no need to switch the shield. If we do have to switch the shield, it clearly indicates the shield is part of the radiating system. Now we might get away with common mode current by band-aiding around it, but I always like to learn why it is a problem and fix the problem. Then shields can remain grounded, cables dressed together and taped to tower legs....or whatever I like without worry that the whole system will quit working. That's actually the only reason I use coax. > P.S. Personally, I would go with a driven system (Comtek) if I were > using full-size dipoles...you only need 4 instead of 5 and the results > are more predictable using a forced system IMHO. So would I, if I was serious about the band. With a four-square of dipoles you get, in effect, a three element end-fire array. With a single dipole fed you really have a two element array with what we might consider a three or four wire reflector. I think the results would be noticeably better, and the hardware addition is slight. Like many things, it is a trade of performance and cost. Now I'm thinking of installing one on 80 meters, maybe at first as a Petrezewsjki(sp?) array but with the common mode problems removed. Then I can just use an RCS-8, because I rarely work 80 anyway. I'll use N connectors, put rope in the elements, point it at true north, and use an owl to house each balun. With enough luck, it will heat the ionosphere and make the path open and be published in Radiosporting Magazine. 73, Tom W8JI W8JI@contesting.com List Sponsor: ChampionRadio.com - Trylon self-supporting towers, safety equipment, rigging gear, LOOS tension guages & more! http://www.championradio.com ----- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com ```
 Current Thread [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., David J. Windisch [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., W0UN--Signal Hill Ranch [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Tom Rauch [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Pete Smith [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Tom Rauch [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., n4kg@juno.com [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., K3BU@aol.com [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Bill Tippett [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., George Fremin III - K5TR [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Tom Rauch <= [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Pete Smith [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Tom Rauch [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., thompson@mindspring.com [TowerTalk] X beam, Tom Rauch [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Maurizio Panicara [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Bill Tippett [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., Tom Osborne [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., K7GCO@aol.com [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .., John Kaufmann [TowerTalk] Knicked/Gauged Coax !, Jim Reid