Thanks for your comments. One thing from among many that I learned
from DIck's articles is this : The figure 2/3 IS WRONG! NEVER use 2/3 to
calculate ANYTHING regarding wind loading of a tower. The correct figure,
according to Dick, is ALWAYS greater than 1, unless you're calculating the
force on a short, wide piece of cylinder, like maybe a coax balun at a
feedpoint. Then Dick cites drag coefficients of less than unity.
Gene Smar AD3F
From: W5LT@aol.com <W5LT@aol.com>
To: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net <SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net>
Date: Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:36 AM
Subject: Wind Loading
>I commend you on your efforts to correctly calculate the windloading of
>I know Dick personally and agree he has do\ne Hamdom a true service by
>publishig the correct ways to handle these problems.
>You have independently verified the major problem that antenna
>DO NOT properly rate their products in a way that is useful in the users.
>Modern tower specs are based on Projected Area, as you have done. The
>people like to go with the 2/3 adjustment to PA to make the number look
>smaller for marketing reasons.
>When I first met Dick and presented him with a tower loading problem I was
>wrestling with, the first question he asked was how did I calculate the
>antenna wind load? I gave the correct answer, which apparently much
>my credibility. (I said: absent any other data, I would increase the
>manufacturer's number by 50%).
>Good luck and keep doing the right thing.
List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this summer? Call us
for information on our fabulous Trylon Titan self-supporting towers - up to
96-feet for less than $2000! at 888-833-3104 <A
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com