LPL impression is confirmed by also my own, although I'm convinced that 10m
benefits of very low angles much more than any other HF band.
At IR4T we have infact a 10m yagi 7WL over a nearly perfectly flat ground,
extending for miles, and there isn't such a benefit with a lower antenna
when we tried that.
On the contrary, the 20m antenna, *only* 3.5 WL over ground, seems not to be
so much performant at such height for some paths.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David O Hachadorian" <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better?
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:21:57 -0500 Bill Coleman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I'm sure these guys rarely find conditions where a SINGLE yagi above
> > 1.5
> > wavelengths is outmatched by a SINGLE yagi higher in the stack.
> LPL told me one time that his best antenna is a large 10 M Yagi
> at 200'. He theorizes that when you get an antenna that high, in
> terms of wavelength, the nulls fill in and become almost
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, AZ
> This list is sponsored by the new eHam.net Store. When you buy products
> like ICE filters, Array Solutions StackMatch, or M-Squared Antennas from
> the eHam Store for the same price you pay direct, a portion of the sale
> price goes to support this list. Check it out at http://www.eham.net.
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions: email@example.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: firstname.lastname@example.org
This list is sponsored by the new eHam.net Store. When you buy products
like ICE filters, Array Solutions StackMatch, or M-Squared Antennas from
the eHam Store for the same price you pay direct, a portion of the sale
price goes to support this list. Check it out at http://www.eham.net.
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com