Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[Towertalk] Distance to tower

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [Towertalk] Distance to tower
From: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 12:46:29 -0400
Recognizing this is the "TOWER" reflector, nevertheless, the purpose/use of
the antenna system on the tower
must be paramount in importance, and in fact, determining the design.

For single op, all-band contesters, N4KG's offering is not optimal.  Having
all antennas rotate together
would slow-down a single-op, all-band contester.

For single-band contests, this rotating tower works well.

Food for thought.

Bill, N3RR


----- Original Message -----
From: <n4kg@juno.com>
To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>; <ford@cmgate.com>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] Distance to tower


> Here's my idea for a single 160 ft tower:
>
> First, ROTATE the TOWER.
>
> Second, use fiberglass guy rod at 40, 80, 120, 160 ft.
>
> Antennas:
>
> 160 ft   2L40 plus 80M rotary dipole (at right angles)
>
> 120 ft   BIG Tribander or 5 Bander
>
> 80 ft     2L40 (plus dipole for 30, or 2L30)
>
> 40 ft     Tribander or 5 Bander
>
> Rationale:
>
> Stacked 2L40's at 160 / 80 ft provides as much gain as a 3L40
> on a 48 ft boom with much smaller booms.  80M dipoles play
> very well at 160 ft.
>
> 120 ft for high bands provides good low angle coverage AND
> the second lobe is placed at the upper end of the range of
> angles by the ionosphere.
>
> 40 ft for high bands is a GREAT Daytime height for the high
> bands and it fills in the NULLS of the higher high band antenna.
>
> A second tower (40 to 60 ft) with another tribander or 5 bander is
> useful.
>
> Above analysis assumes LEVEL Terrain.
>
> Tom  N4KG
>
>
> On Thu, 9 May 2002  "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com> writes:
> > My antenna was destroyed last weekend.  Bummer. Oh well, time to
> > rebuild.
> >
> > I'm thinking about 160' of Rohn 45.   A 40 - 10 meter yagi will sit
> > at the top.>
> > Here's my problem.  The ideal location is in a field on the west end
> > of the
> > property.  Feedlines will be > 400' to shack #1 and over 600' to
> > shack 2.
> > Open lines are awfully bulky and would have to be strung over
> > driveways,
> > etc.
> >
> > Is this manageable with coax?  Am I looking at preamps and hardline
> > as the
> > only option?
> >
> > I'm looking for ideas.
> >
> > Ford-N0FP
> > ford@cmgate.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Towertalk mailing list
> > Towertalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk



#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>