It was in CQ; not QST. July issue as I recall.
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 16:34:26 +0000 firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>Well, guys there is some validity of the concern about a side mounted
>antenna or other, causing undo stresses on a tower. Wasn't there an
>article in last month's QST that talked about how most installations are
>not good and if the stresses are calculated, most towers could collapse?
>Little 2M beams may be one thing but larger HF antennas may be a future
>problem, regardless of the number of legs attached. Look around for that
>article and consult with its author and/or your own local structural
>engineer. Phil KB9CRY
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com