[Top] [All Lists]

[Towertalk] Re: Trylon and AN towers

To: <>
Subject: [Towertalk] Re: Trylon and AN towers
From: (
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:48:42 EDT
In a message dated 9/1/02 5:48:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, writes:

> Fact of the matter is, I'm not bringing up these points totally because of
>  my position in the tower business. I just feel that others should know what
>  they're buying, and how very misleading advertising and marketing can be. 

    There isn't any misleading advertising vis-a-vis the Trylon towers. Just 
because they're different doesn't mean one's useful and the other isn't.

>  I choose to manufacture a quality tower that I'm proud to have my name
>  associated with.

    Well, sure - we all stand by our reputations. I'm happy you have 
something like that. 
>  As mentioned earlier, I could go on further.

    The differences between the Trylon towers and yours IS NOT a pissing 
contest. People can be educated on the difference and they can make their own 
decisions. Just because it's not an AN tower doesn't mean that it's dangerous 
and unreliable. 

    TowerTalk is not a forum for slamming dealers or manufacturers. We deal 
in thoughtful informative posts where the members can make their own 
decisions about who says what about something. 

Steve    K7LXC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Towertalk] Re: Trylon and AN towers, <=