... the Cloudbourners at http://www.cebik.com/cb.html are covering this
subject too ...
73sss
Carsten, DL6LAU
> -----Original Message-----
> From: K7LXC@aol.com [SMTP:K7LXC@aol.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 5. November 2002 15:39
> To: n4zr@contesting.com; towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Towertalk] Low dipoles
>
> In a message dated 11/4/02 7:46:30 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> n4zr@contesting.com writes:
>
> > For next year I'm thinking of low dipoles for 40 and 80, a lot further
> away
> > from the guys. Ideally I'd run them off the same feedline, and fan the
>
> > ends of the 40m dipole a foot or so below the 80m one. Any thoughts on
>
> how
> > that will work, and whether I'd be better off making them separate
> antennas
> > to optimize the height?
>
> A novel east coast idea via K3LR years ago is to put a reflector wire
> on
> the ground under the low dipole. Cheap and easy way to get some more dB in
>
> the air.
>
> Cheers,
> Steve K7LXC
> TOWER TECH
> _______________________________________________
> AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers at discounted prices,
> See http://www.mscomputer.com
>
> Wireless Weather Stations now $349.95. Call Toll Free,
> 888-333-9041 for additional information.
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|