I wouldn't think three towers on six acres of land was unreasonable.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Turner" <email@example.com>
To: "Jerry Muller" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Chicago Tribune: Antenna Stirs Static Among
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:17:38 -0400, "Jerry Muller" <email@example.com>
> >This guy got off easy. I live in "Live Free or Die" New Hampshire and had
> >spend over $25K in legal fees to protect three towers on six acres that
> >almost invisible. (New Hampshire Supreme Court, Marchand v. Hudson)
> >Jerry, K0TV
> Seems to me that you're the one that got off easy. I can see the
> justification for one tower being necessary at a height of 75 feet or
> so, but I understand yours are 90 feet, right? And three of them?
> I'm all in favor of ham radio - been licensed for 46 years - but even
> I might think that's pushing the neighbors a bit.
> 73, Bill W7TI
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> TowerTalk mailing list