|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] P.S.: Surge supression|
|From:||"S. J. Blackwell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:58:15 +0000|
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
It seems to me that it will nevertheless still add an unwanted rf ground loop. It sounds like it might not be a problem provided you
The concept of "RF ground loop" does not compute for me. It seems we are getting audio concepts in here. The ground length as a function of frequency will be all over the place from band to band. It seems that the best way to keep RF out of the shack is not have it there in the first place. Certainly it would be difficult (impossible?) to simply send it to ground in most shacks. The concept of safety and RF grounds are apples and oranges. Am I missing something here?
73 Sam, W5LU
MSN Messenger with backgrounds, emoticons and more. http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_customize
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[TowerTalk] 9913 vs 9913F7, steve sala|
|Next by Date:||[TowerTalk] Improving my 80 meter antenna, N6CW|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] P.S.: Surge supression, Michael Tope|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] P.S.: Surge supression, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|