Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L

To: kb9cry@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L
From: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:27:08 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
In this situation, what is your opinion of a sloper using a SGC tuner
at the top of the tower attached to the sloper wire with the tower
acting as the counterpoise for the sloper.  I plan to do this at my
QTH to give me 40, 80, and maybe 160.  Your ideas please.
73

kb9cry@comcast.net wrote:
> 
> All that dipoles do on 160M is to warm the clouds above your house.  I'd 
> shunt feed the tower.  That's what I do and it's a killer.  Just remember 
> that whatever you do, you'll want to investigate low band receiving antennas 
> also.  You want vertically polarized, low angle of radiation transmit signal 
> for 160M but that also will receive all the vertically polarized noise from 
> around the area therefore the need for receiving antennas.  If you have no 
> room for a beverage (500 ft. min per my experience) then investigate the 
> loops, pennants, flags, etc.  I have a rotatable delta loop that works very 
> well.  I can send some urls of info if you need.  Gd luck, Phil  KB9CRY
> > Hello all
> > I'm trying to get something up for 160m.  I've been using my 80m loop
> > and a tuner but its real hard to tune and not very effecient.  Maby when
> > I get my balanced tuner project done that won't be a problem but for
> > now it is.  Thinking about a 160m inverted L but space is still a problem.
> > I can support the vertical portion with my 40' tower and I have about 80'
> > from it to a tall wooden pole. Thats too short and too close but thats all I
> > have to work with.  I try to avoid loaded antennas because of effeciency
> > but what if I added a helical loaded section near the end of the horizontal
> > leg (opposite end from the vertical segment)??
> > I would end up with a 38' vertical section,  a 70' horizontal section and
> > about a 5' section of helical loaded wire.  That gives me about 5' for rope
> > on the pole end.
> > Any thouights on this or should I go back to a low dipole or some commercial
> > vertical and live with it???
> > Thanks
> > JerryC
> > KC8TES
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> 
> > See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
> > Weather
> > Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
> > questions
> > and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

-- 
__________________________________________________________________________      
                 
                                     Alan Zack
                     Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ
                         Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
          Quality Engineer, The Boeing Company, Retired
  Aviation Chief Warrant Officer, U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
        U.S. Coast Guard, Always Ready, Always There
Every hour, Every day, Around the Clock and Around the World
                               SEMPER PARATUS
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>