|To:||"Dudley Chapman" <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] RE: One Man Tower|
|From:||Pete Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:24:13 -0500|
At 09:10 AM 2/18/04 -0500, Dudley Chapman wrote:
After seeing your message I found this. What do people think about these towers?
I was perplexed by the windload numbers. The site says:
The wind speed ratings given below are from the engineer's certification for the Mark 4 tower design. The report is for the 15-meter (49.7 ft) tower and is expressed in the Load Range Factor Design (LRFD) standards used in the U.S.A. The antenna is assumed to have a surface area of 19 square feet.
Ratings are given for the antenna in its operating position at the top of the tower and for the antenna in its lowest position.
I've never heard of LRFD standards in the ham antenna context (or anywhere else), and wonder how successful you would be in persuading your local building permit office to accept these numbers in lieu of the EIA standard-derived figures for 70mph, 90 mph and so on. Looks like you might be putting yourself in for some extra engineering costs.
No prices on the site either. It would be interesting to see how they compare with conventional crank-ups.
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|