To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] The Trojan Horse (BPL) |
From: | Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:22:12 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
The Trojan Horse (BPL) A scaled down version of BPL is available at many computer stores right now. It comes in the from of special modems that use RF frequencies to allow a person to route relatively high speed internet connections thru out their home via the house wiring. HomePlug products worked out a deal with the ARRL to program their modem DSPs not to produce any signals in the ham bands. This can be seen in the data sheets of the DSP products produced by Analog Devices just for HomePlug products <http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data_Sheets/35466054AD9975_0.pdf> and look at spectra plot "TPC 8". Or find other examples by doing a google search for Analog Devices and HomePlug. Looking at the spectra of the ouput of these DSP chips you will see that no carriers are produced in the ham bands. But are produced everywhere else such as the Short Wave Listening bands, WWV frequencies, aviation, marine and wether fax frequencies. The BPL modems will most likely if not already be programmed to do the same thus resolving most amateur radio concerns. Now for the Trojan Horse. Lets say they do not produce ANY interference on the ham bands. And BPL is raised to the level of being a valuable asset to Homeland Security and is used in every community. The Power Line companies want to do more than to just get into the internet business and provide service to rural areas. They want to get into the Telephone (VoIP) and Paid-Per-View-Movie business. And while doing so they totally control the access thru the power lines to peoples' homes thus giving them a real advantage over other ISP companies and even the Telephone companies themselves. Now you begin to transmit on 20 meters with your 100 watt transceiver and your spouse tells you that the neighbor's telephone has stopped working. OOPS, it is a BPL VoIP phone and you are disabling the entire area network in for a block. They complain to the FCC who tells you that Homeland Security in a National Priority and you will have to just stop what it is that you are doing that disables the BPL network. This is a real possibility. The public backlash at the ham community along with the current Homeland Security mind fix could cause serious changes in ham radio either by FCC rulings or executive order from the President. You see, even though it is easy to prevent the BPL modems from producing ANY QRM on the ham bands by simple programming it is not so easy to make them immune to overload from ham radio transmissions. The Analog to Digital Converters (ADC) could easily be overwhelmed by the RF received by the power lines and data would stop flowing. The only way to prevent this is to have passive filters for each and every ham band on the input of each ADC. And if they were also in the path of between the DAC and the power lines it would be even better. But that may add excessive cost to the Modems. Presently, the FCC is only looking at Part 15. This has to do with the interference of unlicensed devices to other services. Not how licensed services may affect the BPL modems. The FCC must also set standards for BPL not only those having to do with the signals that they may inadvertently radiate. These must have various details for the modulation methods ,data transfer protocol, and encryption. They should also include details of how the above filters will be implemented and what will be done to resolve problems between licensed services and BPL. However, this still does nothing for the Short Wave Listeners. HF propagation is too valuable to ruin by implementation of BPL. One solution would be to allow BPL to use frequencies above 30MHz and to 80 MHz filtering out the range from 50 to 54 MHz thus only adding 2 filters to the Modems. This would reduce their usable bandwidth from 78 MHz to 46 MHz. And by increasing the amount of power allowed on the transmission lines by 6 db they can double their data bandwidth thus taking them back to the same data bandwidth that they started at. Actually a little bit better. Another approach would be to increase the transmission power a bit more and limit their RF bandwidth to the low VHF TV channels (56 to 80 MHz). Increasing the signal to noise ratio allows you do to do the same thing as your 56Kbaud modem. You are able to use a 4KHz (actually a bit less) bandwidth telephone line to transmit much higher data bandwidths. But only if you have sufficient signal to noise ratio. Sorry for the long (hopefully non-political) message. And those of you that are sending in last minute comments may consider these technical suggestions. A few other comments. Shortwave Listeners have been having problems with the HomePlug devices producing interference. BPL is likely to be even worse for them. By the way. A little over 15 years ago some of the power utility companies started running fiber optic cables across the nation with plans to create a new telephone system ,but forgot to get the approval of the FCC before they started. The FCC stopped them cold in their tracks. 73 Bill wa4lav _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Ground system, Lee Buller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Ground system, how to drive ground rod, Dave NØRQ |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Disconnecting wire antenna and grounding at the tower, Alan Beagley |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] The Trojan Horse (BPL), on4kj |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |