|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Mast Load Question|
|From:||Jim Schnaidt <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Thu, 27 May 2004 06:52:37 -0500|
On May 26, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Dave Hachadorian, K6LL wrote:
One question, though. Why the .707 in the calculation? Has this to do with the fact that the tower is laid over to about 45 degrees? I think the sin of 45 degrees is around .707. Is that correct?
It appears the bigger problem may be the ability of the tower raising fixture to handle the 250 extra pounds on the top of the tower when it's tilted over. I need to contact US Tower regarding this. Someone has emailed privately that someone told him 500# max at the top of the tower. With the chrome alloy mast and about 140# of antennas, I think I'm still within specs there but need to verify that. Otherwise, it seems the rotor bolt stress won't be near what I originally envisioned.
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Question: I-Beams as Guy Anchors, Grillo's|
|Next by Date:||[TowerTalk] All wet on mast strength, Pete Smith|
|Previous by Thread:||RE: [TowerTalk] Mast load question, Wendell Wyly - W5FL|
|Next by Thread:||[TowerTalk] antenna installation, George Yazz|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|