Yeah, seems a waste to me. The only advantage would be to reduce side
force on the rotor by increasing the length of it's side of the lever.
David Robbins K1TTT
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:towertalk-
> email@example.com] On Behalf Of Julio Peralta
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:45
> To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] (no subject)
> What is the purpose of putting a rotor 20 to 25' below the top of the
> tower. It seems a waste of expensive mast material to me.
> Julio, W4HY
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers",
> Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041
> any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> TowerTalk mailing list
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
TowerTalk mailing list