Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Using older rotor cable?

To: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>,"Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>, <lladerman@earthlink.net>,<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Using older rotor cable?
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 15:50:56 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
At 03:23 PM 5/29/2004, Tower (K8RI) wrote:
Do I advocate scrimping on rotor cable? No.  If you have the time (and
money) I'd put in all new *quality* cable.  When I put up the new tower I
put in all new cables including 6 228 foot runs of LMR 400, two rotor cables
(one for the rotor and one for the remote antenna switch) and two RG-6 runs
for the TV antennas.


You can, however, save quite a lot by using CAT 3 network cable (8 conductors) instead of rotator cable for most remote antenna switches. The voltage drop is trivial for even a 200-foot run like I have.


73, Pete N4ZR
The World HF Contest Station Database
was updated on April 26, 2004
2706 contest stations at
www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>