Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please

To: <Towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please
From: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: keith@dutson.net
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:12:43 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Read further and you will find lots of comments from many on this list.

Congrats on your purchase.  A friend of mine recently obtained the same
antenna and is quite pleased with its performance.  However I seem to push S
meters a bit further in limited comparison tests.  Might be because I am at
150 feet vs. his at below 100 feet.

Does the 4 el work on 40 meters?  The C-4XL weighs 65 pounds and has 8.2 sq
ft wind load rating.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: Daly, Greg TQO [mailto:gdaly@tqs.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:40 PM
To: keith@dutson.net; Towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please

According to the manual with my Steppir the matching circuit is a Jerry
Sevick design 2:1 balun on a 2 1/4 inch ferrite core. It sounds reasonably
simple and low loss to me. How much does the Force 12 weigh, the 4 element
Steppir is about 80 pounds. How well does the Force 12 work on 6 meters? The
Steppir claims 13 dBi gain and 30 dB front to back. Reliability may be a
problem with the Steppir, but I doubt it. All of important RF connections
are protected from the weather, and the radiating elements are Beryllium
copper, sounds better than an aluminum antenna to me.... I trust you
remembered to grease up all your joints before you put up the force 12.

I'll take the SteppIR.... 

WB7RSG

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Dutson [mailto:kjdutson@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please


>Ten Tec Orion, Alpha 87A and the 4 element SteppIR

Nice station!

Your SteppIR must have the complicated matching network to work for all
bands since element positioning is a compromise with the design.  This
network is lossy.

By contrast, a Force 12 multi-monoband has no such compromise and no
associated loss.

Give me the Force 12 antenna for simplicity, strength and light weight.

BTW, my station:
Icom 775DSP, Alpha 87A, Force 12 C-4XL (soon to be a stack of C-4XL, C3,
C-4XL, C3 on 150 foot tower).

Keith WD5DXL

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>