|To:||Larry Phipps <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Actual LP Performance vs Tribanders|
|From:||Jim Lux <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:37:00 -0700|
At 02:08 AM 6/28/2004 -0400, Larry Phipps wrote:|
Jim, I'm not that familiar with the beacons, but since your post I did a little research. There are a couple of major problems.
Yes, I agree that you'd have a problem doing the measurement in one pass through. You'd have to do a statistical approach over many days and hours.
Timing you can get from the signals themselves, and the PC clock is good enough to sequence it. As long as you're within a few seconds of the "real" time, it's fairly straightforward to track (programs like BeaconSee do it, for instance).
You could correlate the signal strength on the antenna under test to a very short monopole antenna or small non-resonant loop (which will be fairly consistent in azimuth and elevation response).
Even with a 20 minute continuous carrier at 100W, I doubt the received strength of the beacons would be enough to be useful for plotting the pattern of a beam with 30dB F/B ratio. You would need a stable signal about 50dB above the noise floor... probably something around S9... and you'd have to listen to make sure there is no interference while the samples are being taken.
Kind of depends on the accuracy you require. If you want tenth dB accuracy on something that is 30 dB down, it would be a challenge (I doubt there are many antenna ranges or network analyzers that can do that well). If you are willing to tolerate 1dB errors (out of 30), and, say, 0.5 dB out of 10dB, I think you could do it with, maybe, 10-15 dB SNR. Depending on the integration time. If the beacon is sufficiently narrow band (which the NCDXF beacons are, during the test tones), your measurement bandwidth (which sets the SNR) can be quite narrow (probably limited by ionospheric doppler spread). Maybe 5-10 Hz?
Using the noise level in VOACAP for residential areas (-145 dBW/Hz), you're only going to be seeing something like -105 dBm noise floors. Running a quick VOACAP from a monopole in Tangier to a swwhip Los Angeles, (june SSN=100) it looks like you'll have SNR (in 1 Hz) of above 15 dB for about 4 hours. That's going to be a bit marginal.
However, as you point out, big broadcast stations would be a better bet.
My tests used commercial stations with BIG signals that transmit continuously, like WWV. I was testing a very broadband beam, so actual frequencies weren't that important. Testing a LPDA or SteppIR should also work OK with my software. You could probably make it work with a ham with a strong signal though, who would be willing to make several 5 minute continuous transmissions while the data was gathered.
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] RF exposure and my neighbor, Jerry Muller|
|Next by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Actual LP Performance vs Tribanders, Jim Lux|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] 1/4" Aluminum Tubing, va3pl at cuic.ca|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Actual LP Performance vs Tribanders, Michael Tope|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|