|To:||Pete Smith <email@example.com>,Larry Phipps <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Actual LP Performance vs Tribanders|
|From:||Jim Lux <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:51:31 -0700|
At 07:02 AM 6/28/2004 -0400, Pete Smith wrote:
At 02:08 AM 6/28/2004, Larry Phipps wrote:
I wouldn't use the s-meter. I'd use a receiver with the AGC disabled and look at the audio output with a PC. The PC lets you digitize the signal so you can measure in a very narrow bandwidth (helping the SNR), and is quite linear.
Just as a practical note, I ran BeaconSee (a NCDXF beacon monitoring program) for a while with an ICOM PCR-1000 receiver hooked up to a 30m band dipole a few feet off the ground. I don't recall the detection bandwidth, but it's quite narrow. You could see almost all beacons, at some time during the day.
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Actual LP Performance vs Tribanders, Jim Lux|
|Next by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] RF exposure and my neighbor, Michael Tope|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Actual LP Performance vs Tribanders, Larry Phipps|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Actual LP Performance vs Tribanders, corneliuspaul|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|