[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Take off angles

To: <>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Take off angles
From: "Jim Lux" <>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 06:53:23 -0700
List-post: <>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Rauch" <>
To: <>; <>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 4:29 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Take off angles

> > I wonder if Guy's observation begs the question, if both
> ends have antennas
> > with different vertical apertures (or horizontal patterns)
> which is more often
> > the case, then different take off angles versus arrival
> angles might go some
> > way to explaining the apparent paradox of 'one-way-skip'.
> If my antenna has a deep null at the favored angle, it is
> there on both transmitting and receiving.
> I think most cases of "one-way skip" are really other easily
> explained very common effects, like high noise or poor
> antennas.

It could also be a polarization fading thing.  The timescale of fades (or,
if you will, the distribution of multipath) has a pretty wide range.

How deep (and narrow) are the nulls in the vertical plane on a real antenna,
anyway?  10 dB? 20dB?   And a corollary question, how wide a variation in
takeoff angle is there on a given path at a given time?


See:  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>