|Subject:||[TowerTalk] BPL interference|
|From:||"Rick Bullon" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Sat, 30 Oct 2004 03:51:40 +0000|
I know that the BPL issue has been beat to death and I don't to upset any of you that is feed up with the last few threads on the subject but, I just read the latest ARRL Bulletin. There is a quote in there from the FCC that really surprised me!
In a footnote, the FCC admonished ARRL that in cases where its members experience RF noise, "such noise can often be avoided by carefully locating their antennas; in many instances an antenna relocation of only a relatively short distance can resolve noise interference."
So according to the above statement if we expirence interference from BPL we are suppose to move our antennas!!! I don't know about any one else but I will be damn if they want be to move my 70'tower because of BPL!!!
This is going to affect most of you in the cities more than me. BPL is suppose to bring high speed internet to the rural areas like mine yea sure when pigs fly, I'll never see BPL here where it is suppose to be but those of you in the cities better start looking for a new place for their antennas because it seems the FCC is going to back pedal on BPL interface complaints
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Cable TV hardline question - for Beverages, Tom Rauch|
|Next by Date:||[TowerTalk] Aluma Tower Value?, Mark - AA6DX|
|Previous by Thread:||[TowerTalk] mosley ta-40-kr modification., J.Hector Garcia M|
|Next by Thread:||RE: [TowerTalk] BPL interference, Paul Playford|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|