|Subject:||[TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM-240 vs Optibeam 40/30|
|From:||"Rick Kourey (K4KL)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Sat, 13 Nov 2004 14:03:12 -0500|
I consistently read where most Tower-talkians rate the performance of the
Cushcraft XM-240 very favorably.|
Cushcraft rates the XM-240 for only 1,500 watts. Does the lower power
rating pose any kind of problem when you run long QSO's of 1,500 watts of RTTY through it.
Secondly, does anyone know how well the 2-element Optibeam for 40meter/30
meter beam compares to the 2-element Cushcraft XM-240 both in performance and ruggedness.
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM-240 vs Optibeam 40/30, Rick Kourey (K4KL)|
|Next by Date:||[TowerTalk] KLM KT-34A, jerrybale|
|Previous by Thread:||[TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM-240 vs Optibeam 40/30, Rick Kourey (K4KL)|
|Next by Thread:||[TowerTalk] KLM KT-34A, jerrybale|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|