Just a tryal to get that toilet paper to the list.
De?: hermans [mailto:email@example.com]
Envoyé?: mardi 11 janvier 2005 11:58
À?: 'Alan Zack'; 'Mike D.'
Objet?: RE : [TowerTalk] firstname.lastname@example.org
Tastes and colours, a great discussion........
Automating automated toilet paper dispensers.........
Still tastes and colours .....
Happy new Year
[mailto:email@example.com] De la part de Alan Zack
Envoyé?: mardi 11 janvier 2005 0:05
À?: Mike D.
Objet?: Re: [TowerTalk] firstname.lastname@example.org
I believe that is a decision that should be made by the list
administrator, not you. Until the administrator closes the topic it
would be open to discussion by interested users of the reflector to
present their suggestions or points of view. If you were at a City
Hall meeting where some public forum was being discussed would you
jump up and say its time to end the discussion? I think not. You
would wait for the person in charge to end the discussion. Of course,
you could leave anytime you wished. I believe the same decorum stands
on reflectors. Have you ever been on Jury Duty? Do you end the
discussion or the jury foreman?
Mike D. wrote:
>>From: Alan Zack [mailto:email@example.com]
>>That would mean everyone using CALLSIGN@arrl.net,
>>CALLSIGN@jarl.net, CALLSIGN@darc.net, etc., would be dropped.
> It would mean that everyone using an alias account would have to
> using their "real" e-mail address. It would not prohibit anyone from
> enjoying the benefits of TowerTalk, that is currently enjoying it.
> It would also mean that the [firstname.lastname@example.org] bounced messages would
> stop. It would also mean that someone else's bounced messages won't
> at a later date. It will also mean that eventually this discussion
> 73 de Mike, N9BOR
> A-1, FISTS, JARL A-1, SMC
> di dah dit - The only Roger Beep you'll ever need.
> Let your fingers do the talking - Morse code.
> My designated driver is a 12BY7A.
>>Mike D. wrote:
>>>Thanks for your note. Yes, you, et al, might "like" using an alias
>>>e-mail account, but that is the problem. Your unwillingness to be
>>>slightly inconvenienced, when/if you ever change your
>>>is probably the same reason [email@example.com] subscribed using his.
>>>There are probably 700+ subscribers to TowerTalk. The few
>>>using alias accounts are apparently unwilling to be personally
>>>inconvenienced, yet are also bothered by NEVER ENDING
>>bounces to every
>>>contributor. There is no way to test every subscribed
>>>If there were, the MAILMAN software would have removed the
>>>address a long time ago. It is automatic-I administer seven
>>Ham Radio lists using this application.
>>>The only practical solution is for the list administrator to
>>>unsubscribe every known e-mail forwarding address and
>>>subscriptions from those addresses.
>>>73 de Mike, N9BOR
>>>A-1, FISTS, JARL A-1, SMC
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with
any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
TowerTalk mailing list
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
TowerTalk mailing list